Why Is Art Incompatible With Happiness in Brave New World
Are Truth and Happiness Compatible? What I learned from Brave New World.
Truth and Happiness: The reality
A mix of mass production, consumerism, and conditioning are amidst the many things that make up order. They are likewise the key mechanism that make upwardly the dystopia World State in Dauntless New World by Aldous Huxley. Information technology is inside Brave New World that Huxley argues that happiness and truth are incompatible, and that society is on a path toward a like earth. In this globe, people are docile, ignorance is bliss, the idea of desire is reduced to concrete pleasure, which is often heightened by the fictional drug soma. The motto in Brave New World is:
"every 1 belongs to every i else…"
Withal, while Huxley establishes a house stance that truth and happiness are incompatible, it is within reason to believe that how i pursues truth has influence over their happiness; therefore, truth and happiness tin indeed go mitt and hand, only act in the same fashion as committed relationships: arduous, yet endurable, equally long as participants piece of work toward equilibrium.
Truth and Happiness, Co-ordinate to Huxley:
Fortunately, Huxley narrows downward his meaning of truth and happiness. For Huxley, truth is found through art and science, while happiness is juxtapose to stability. As a affair of fact, according to Mustapha Mond, the world controller, happiness in society is stability, only according to him, it comes at a toll:
"…The earth's stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they tin can't get. They're well off; they're safe; they're never ill; they're non afraid of death; they're blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they're plagued with no mothers or fathers; they've got no wives, or children, or lovers to experience strongly almost; they're and then status that they practically can't help behaving as they ought to behave."
The people of brave new world are happy considering they are stable; they aren't anxious about the looming anxiety's that are unique to mankind. Mustapha Mond's claims are, indeed, bonny. Who wants to worry about about death, affliction, and whether or not you can make ends meet? We have to enquire ourselves if such a life would exist easier; if nosotros have been doing things wrong from the get-go.
Embracing Suffering:
John, the savage, is Huxley's best example of the courage it takes to alive with suffering and to exist self-destructively obsessed with information technology. Throughout the heart of the novel, John is appalled by the, "o' brave new world that has such people in it." In fact, he is so horrified by information technology, eventually he tries, prematurely, to liberate the lower caste of Deltas by throwing out the soma. This action leads to the give-and-take between John and Mustapha Mond, which ends in John stubbornly refuting the earth state. It is in this give-and-take that John says:
"You lot got rid of them. Yes, that'south only like yous. Getting rid of everything unpleasant instead of learning to put up with it. Whether 'tis better in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows or outrageous fortune, or to take artillery against a ocean of troubles and past opposing finish them…But you don't do either. Neither suffer nor oppose. You lot simply abolish the slings and arrows. It's too piece of cake."
Instead of against the absurdity of life, the "dauntless new world" abandons half of life for fleeting indulgences, pre-determined appearances, and unnatural conditioning. The unmarried trouble that the world land has is the claim that information technology has organized life; social club is ranked above freedom; sex above personal connectedness; hallucinogens' above life's natural pleasures — the sacrifices necessary for a earth ruled by i slogan:
"anybody belongs to everyone else"
So, What Accept I Learned?
Honestly, to choose between a life of pleasure and a life of suffering is every bit circuitous equally the applesauce of life itself. We somehow can't shake the feeling that we want the former, for it is enticing to indulge in everything that is all also homo. Information technology is at the stop of the novel where John ultimately gives in to pleasure after choosing suffering. Therefore, it is a offset to ask how we can reconcile with life in general instead of choosing betwixt one terminate of the spectrum.
Source: https://sgarden.medium.com/are-truth-and-happiness-compatible-what-i-learned-from-brave-new-world-c2ce047ccee4
0 Response to "Why Is Art Incompatible With Happiness in Brave New World"
Postar um comentário